However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 18, 2020, the Defendant: (a) around 21:04, the Changwon-si, Changwon-si, the victim C sought the victim to demand the payment of the construction cost of the building; (b) however, the victim could not have been on the road; and (c) caused the failure to meet it; and (d) destroyed the repair cost of KRW 28,00 by deducting four wind from the car to the air influen of the air influor of the DoW 730D car, which is owned by the victim and parked there, by inserting it into the air influor.

Summary of Evidence

1. The police statement of the victim who has made a court statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on photographs and estimates;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 366 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. The main sentence of Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is not good, and the defendant was unable to be punished by the victim.

In addition, the defendant has the same punishment power.

The defendant recognizes his own crime.

The degree of damage is relatively heavy.

In addition, the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstances of each of the crimes of this case, circumstances after the crime, etc. shall be comprehensively considered and the punishment shall be determined as ordered by the order.