beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.10.04 2013고정3246

공전자기록등불실기재등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around October 2009, the Defendant, both B, etc. and the co-principal, who was aware of his work, proposed that he would introduce a person who will be married to Vietnam with a woman of Vietnam from "C (Eindition of personal information, etc.)" and offer that he would be punished by five million won on the face of the birth of a woman of Vietnam who would be married with a woman of Vietnam, and that he would be punished by five million won on the face of the birth of a woman of Vietnam.

On November 19, 2009, B entered the name and personal information of her husband in the husband column in the form of marriage report which was kept in the place, and submitted the name column D and the date of birth to the public official in charge of the registration of family relationship at the place where it was recorded in the name column of her husband in the form of marriage report which was kept in the place, although there was no intention to marry with D, B, according to the electromagnetic records, etc., and B, around November 19, 2009, had the public official who is aware of such fact enter false facts in the family relationship registration information system as a public electronic record.

Around that time, B submitted to the public official in charge of the above marriage report stating the fact of the defect as above, and had him store and operate it in the family relation registration information system.

Accordingly, in collusion with B and D, the defendant made a false report to the public official by making a false report to enter false facts in the family relation registration information system, which is a public electronic record, and exercised it by allowing the public official to preserve it.

B. As above, as seen in the violation of the Immigration Control Act, B entered the Republic of Korea with the knowledge that D’s purpose of entry is not the purpose of marriage, but the purpose of employment is not the purpose of marriage, and obtained a false marriage certificate, family relation certificate, etc. with the intent to receive the payment for the purpose of employment, and start up to the above “C” which is a disguised marriage hub through the Defendant, and received the false means of marriage D on January 12, 2010.

참조조문