사기등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of six months and a fine of five hundred thousand won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000.
Punishment of the crime
1. On May 19, 2017, at around 21:50, the Defendant: (a) expressed the attitude that, even if the Defendant did not hold cash or credit cards, etc. available for settlement in a restaurant operated by the victim C, which was operated by Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon; (b) did not have the intent or ability to pay the price; and (c) did not have the intent or ability to pay the price; and (d) ordered the victim to pay
The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, was provided with alcohol and alcohol equivalent to KRW 57,00 from the victim.
2. The Defendant who damaged a special property stated in paragraph 1 stated that “I will follow the following,” and on the ground that the Defendant demanded the victim to pay again the drinking value from the damaged person at the time and place, the empty beer’s disease and the beer’s disease, which are dangerous objects on the table, were in a non-discriminatory way inside the restaurant, and were in the above restaurant.
42. The damage was made to the property owned by the victim in such a way as to cover the repair cost of 3 million won by breaking the fluor TV, the cooling and glass door for the storage of drinking water.
3. The Defendant, at the time, at the time, and place specified in paragraph 1, committed an assault by beer’s disease, which is a dangerous thing in the victim’s right bucks, as the Defendant was prevented from committing the act described in paragraph 2 from the victim D (50 tax).
4. The Defendant injured by negligence continuously listen to the horses that have changed the drinking value from the injured party, such as the date and time, at the place, as described in paragraph 1, and as described in paragraph 2, the Defendant left the beer and beer disease in the open beer and beer, which had been in that place, with the floor and restaurant.
In such cases, there is a duty of care that the defendant should not perform the above acts, as the Macer and Macer's disease is broken, and the Macer and Macer's disease can be scattered towards people in the vicinity of the glass so that they can sustain injuries.
Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so and the defendant is in the same line as that described in paragraph 2.