A and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

The above defendants did not pay the above fines.

1. On July 30, 2013, at around 11:25, the Defendant: (a) 27-20 waterworks business headquarters in Busan-dong, Busan-dong, 27-20 water supply project headquarters, and (b) 3rdly discovered the victim’s her husband B with the water charge charge, and subsequently found the victim at the latest, “I do not have to get her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her hers her

2. Defendant A committed assault to the victim C (at the age of 43) by setting up against the same date, time, and place as described in paragraph (1) at the same time and place as described in paragraph (1), thereby causing injury to the victim, such as the escape from the 5th in the 2nd century, which requires approximately three weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the defendant A and C;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the police as to B;

1. Each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of photographing the upper part of the suspect;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines for negligence A and C;

1. Defendant A and C in the custody of a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A and C: The portion not guilty under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Defendant B

A. The summary of the facts charged is jointly with Defendant A, as described in paragraph (2) of the facts charged, at the time when Defendant A inflicted an injury on the victim C, Defendant A used both arms and arms of the victim as her hand, thereby pushing the victim into the wall.

As a result, the above Defendants jointly inflicted an injury on the victim, such as the escape card of the 5th Recommend-gu Recommendation that requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment, and the so-called the so-called “influent salt.”

B. Defendant B, who was investigated by the police, consistently with this Court from the police to the time of this Court, asserted that he only told fighting and did not jointly inflict any injury on the victim.