beta
(영문) 청주지방법원 제천지원 2019.07.04 2019고단115

교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)

Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 25, 2019, the Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving service on the part of the Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury).

On March 25, 2019, the defendant, around 12:07, had the roads in front of the D convenience points in Incheon City C progress from the direction of the Si Library to the direction of the Si Library.

Since a crosswalk is installed on the front side, in such a case, there was a duty of care to safely drive the crosswalk by checking whether there is a person to build the crosswalk by reducing speed and by properly examining the front side and the left side of the driver.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and got the victim due to the negligence of driving the crosswalk while the victim E (the 60-year-old age), even though he was standing on the crosswalk, and the victim was faced with the front part of the above Lao.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence, such as a proposal on the left-hand side in need of approximately four weeks of medical treatment, and a letter of unknown part.

2. On March 30, 2019, the Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving FOba in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.

On March 30, 2019, the Defendant continued the crosswalk 264 in front of it from the lower direction to the direction of the road at the lower direction, as it was decided at Incheon-si on March 30, 2019.

Since there is a vehicle signal light and crosswalk installed on the front side, in such a case, the driver had a duty of care to safely drive the crosswalk by checking whether there is a person who gets on a crosswalk, temporarily stopping in front of the crosswalk in accordance with the new subparagraph, reducing speed, and checking well the right and the right and the right of the crosswalk.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and walked the body of the victim G (V, 19 years old) who dried the above crosswalk by neglecting the vehicle stop signal and driving the crosswalk as it is.