However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

On July 12, 2010, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Jeonju District Court on July 12, 201, and a summary order of KRW 5 million to a fine in the same court on September 26, 2012.

On April 15, 2013, without obtaining a driver's license at around 02:21, the Defendant driven a Cunststop vehicle at approximately 700 meters from the front of the Seogsan-gu Busan-si in the front of the Seogsan-si in the Jeonju-si under the influence of alcohol by 0.070%.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Notification of the results of crackdown on drinking driving, and application of statutes to the ledger of driver's licenses;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of a sound driving) and subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 53 or 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation ( normal consideration in favor of the accused among the reasons for sentencing below);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Discretionary of Reasons for Discretionary Mitigation);

1. The defendant of the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act requires a grace period of imprisonment in consideration of the fact that the defendant again repeats the same crime even though he/she had been punished three times after 2008 or for drinking driving, and that he/she had no record of being sentenced to a suspended sentence, etc. before that time, and that he/she has no record of being sentenced to a suspended sentence, and that he/she would not repeat again, thereby seriously