2. The judgment that the defendant recognized the crime of this case, the victim AJ who stolen the defendant, the cell phone owned by AI seems to have been seized and returned to the above victims, and the fact that the defendant is still a juvenile and has no record of criminal punishment so far is favorable to the defendant.

However, there was a record of receiving juvenile protective disposition several times due to the same crime, and the crime of this case was committed by the defendant, even though the defendant was subject to protective disposition for the victim due to the crime of special larceny and fraud, without due care, and without permission, despite being faithfully performed, and thus requires strict punishment. The defendant repeatedly committed the crime of this case against multiple victims, and the total damage amount caused by the crime of this case also reaches about 9.2 million won. The defendant used money received by the defendant by disposing of the stolen article of this case or the money obtained by fraud of this case for entertainment expenses such as "PC protection", and until now, it seems that most victims such as victims G were not recovered properly. When the victim BL of the crime of this case was accused of the victim BL of this case, and the defendant complained of violence and punishment against the defendant, and submitted them to the court of the first instance without punishment, the defendant was subject to punishment within the court below's age of 200,000 won.