However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for six months from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 21, 2015, the Defendant entered a D-owned vehicle owned by the victim C, parked in front of the Gu of Jinnam-si, Gyeongnam-si, Gyeongwon-si on July 21, 2015, with no correction of the door, and was on the top of the lighting.

One doping Co., Ltd. equivalent to KRW 300,000,000, cash 90, 1 50,000 won for agricultural merchandise coupons, 5,00 won for cultural merchandise coupons, 1 copy for merchandise coupons 20,000, and 1 copy for merchandise coupons 20,000 won for merchandise coupons, 20,000 won for merchandise coupons, 3 credit cards for new banks, physical card cards, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (Attachment to photographs of crime scene);

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution [Scope of Recommendation] The mitigated area of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act / [2 months to 10 months] mitigated area of Article 62(2) of the Act on the Larceny of General Property / [3 months to 10 months] [Special Mitigation] [Ruling of Punishment] is agreed with the victim. The circumstances that have no record of the same kind of crime, the defendant's age, sex, sex, family relationship, family environment, motive and means of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc. are considered, and the sentencing conditions indicated in the records of this case are determined as above.