When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person working in the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., and the victim E is a representative of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd.

On February 21, 2014, the Defendant read the article “H” from the Internet newspaper “G,” and accessed the column of the opinion of the above newspaper articles from 302:0 on February 21, 2014 at the Jeju-si, the Defendant had access to the “J” column to the author’s place of residence. “Litin is the representative of K Company L L, dypump for fraud. F Company E representative. Thailand is an area in which wind power business is impossible. Thailand is the area in which Japan companies suffered losses, and the victim was sexually insultingd three times in total, such as preparing a letter of opinion of the newspaper list.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the accused in the first protocol of trial;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to closures;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;