However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

No person shall employ any person who has no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities.

Nevertheless, the Defendant employed six foreigners who did not have the above sojourn qualification as indicated in the separate list of crimes between July 14, 2013 and November 5, 2013 as employees, including employment of D of Vietnam, who did not have the above sojourn status in the “C food” operated by the Defendant at the time of residing between October 3, 2013 and November 5, 2013.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written accusation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on a copy of registered foreigners card;

1. Article 94 subparagraph 9 of the former Immigration Control Act (amended by Act No. 11224, Jan. 26, 2012) and Article 18 (3) of the former Immigration Control Act (amended by Act No. 11224, Jan. 26, 201);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act is divided into several parts in a serious trial,

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc.;