출판물에의한명예훼손등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is the chairperson of the D branch of the D branch of the D branch of the D branch of the D branch of the D branch of the D branch and the F branch. In particular, from April 200 to December 2006, the Defendant was the head of the D branch of the H branch of the D branch of the D branch, from May 201 to April 2014, the victim I tried to run the D branch of the D branch of the D branch of the D branch of the D branch of the D branch of the D branch of the D branch of the Korea branch of the Korea branch of the Korea branch of the Korea branch of the Korea branch of the Korea branch of the Korea branch of the Korea branch of the Korea branch of the Korea branch of the Korea branch of the Korea branch of the Korea branch of the Korea branch of the Korea branch of the Korea branch of the Korea branch of the Korea branch of the Korea branch of the Korea branch of the Korea branch of the Korea branch of the Korea branch of the Korea branch of the Korea branch of the Korea branch of the Korea branch of the Korea branch of the Korea.
1. The Defendant, at around 17:50 on June 29, 2013, had access to the D branch office located in the Guro-gu Seoul High Court (Seoul High Court Decision 2015Da1448, Jun. 29, 2013) and had access to the H branch office website, and had access to the H branch office, and had access to the H branch office, “G L LAAAAE 1,00.”
On October 12, 2007, the board of directors of the D Jong-dong Council expressed a debate on the following matters: “The victim I (the victim’s initial, hereinafter the same shall apply), the victim I (the victim’s statement), the K president took a tension attitude, and the three directors took a fluorial attitude, and induce all of the important litigation costs of 500 million won. However, on December 2, 2006, the victim resigned from the office of the secretariat, and there was no fact attending the above board of directors. Accordingly, on August 9, 2013, the Defendant revealed the fact that it was openly false through an information and communications network, thereby impairing the victim’s reputation. On August 9, 2013, the Defendant, at the same place as above and on the above website as “J-4(a) of the victim,” M&4(a) of L, K, and K.