beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2013.04.02 2012고단656

위증

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 3,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] Defendant A appealed on November 13, 2012 at the Jeonju District Court’s Branch Branch, which was sentenced to imprisonment without prison labor for a violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and is currently pending in the appellate trial. Defendant B appealed on November 13, 2012 at the Jeonju District Court’s Branch Branch, who was sentenced to imprisonment for a period of 8 months with labor for a violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act, and is still pending in the appellate trial.

In addition, on June 30, 201, Defendant A was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Intimidation of collective weapons, etc.) in the Jeonju District Court's branch court's branch court's support on June 30, 201

【Criminal Facts】

1. On December 21, 201, Defendant B driven a G truck on the road near the F located in Go Chang-gun E on December 21, 201, and died due to shocking H.

On December 29, 2011, the Defendant promised to receive the consideration from A, and agreed to proceed with the criminal agreement procedure with the bereaved family members of the above network H for A.

On August 16, 2012, the Defendant had been tried (No. 2012No. 311) by violating the Attorney-at-Law Act in the Jeonju District Court Support, which was located in Susung-dong, Jungsung-dong (Seoul) around 16:30, 2012.

On August 16, 2012, the defendant found A's house located in Go Chang-gun, Go Chang-gun around 16:00.

The Defendant stated that the above A was under investigation by the prosecution and the testimony was made in the court while the above A took place in a difficult situation, and that “self-defense was merely a criminal agreement, and if the criminal agreement is viewed as 20 million won, the remaining difference is deemed as 5 million won as her did not have any part.” The Defendant accepted the above investigation by the prosecution.

A around August 16, 2012, around 16:30 on August 16, 2012, a witness of the defendant's violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act was present and taken an oath.

A The defendant's defense counsel "if the witness agrees to the defendant B not more than 25 million won, the remaining amount shall be the fact that there is a fact."