However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 15, 2010, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 500,000 from the Ulsan District Court to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and a summary order of KRW 3 million to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Ulsan District Court on April 9, 2014, respectively.

Criminal facts

At around 00:00 on October 30, 2015, the Defendant driven BHJ10T Ora while under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.03% at approximately 1.5km section from the front day of the mutually unclaimed restaurant in Ulsan-dong defense Dong-dong, Ulsan-gu to the front day of the 1.5km-dong in the same Gu.

Accordingly, the defendant, who violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol in violation of the above provision.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the results of the crackdown on drinking driving, and the statement of the situation of drinking drivers;

1. Previous for judgment: Application of criminal records, inquiry reports, investigation reports (a confirmation of the same type of power and attachment of summary orders) and other Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act that choose the penalty of imprisonment (Consideration of repeated punishment, etc.);

1. Mitigation of discretionary work and mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da14448, Apr. 2, 201

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution ( repeatedly considering the grounds for discretionary mitigation);

1. Order to attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;