When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On November 7, 2013, the Defendant filed a complaint with her husband D on the following grounds: (a) her husband’s relationship with the victim E (here, 44 years of age); (b) her husband’s statement claiming that the victim was rape; (c) the victim demanded the victim to meet her husband, but the victim refused to meet her body; (d) on December 13, 2013, the victim was raped from D and was subject to habitually intimidation.

Since May 13, 2014, D was prosecuted for rape, etc. with the Cheongju District Court. However, on January 23, 2015, D was not prosecuted for violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (Habitual Intimidation), one year of imprisonment, not guilty for rape, and the appeal is currently in the appellate trial.

On November 27, 2013, at around 16:54, the Defendant sent the victim’s mobile phone text message “I stop in order to maintain one’s husband’s her husband’s her husband’s her husband’s her home,” and, on December 9, 2013, at around 15:07, “I want to have his her family think about, but I want to do so for 15 years of governance, so I would like to look back before her home, and I would like to clarify the crime before her home and handle her day. I sent the last warning to her husband. I sent the same day.” On the same day at around 18:26 p.m., “I would see how I would see how I would see the last day of the text message. I would see how I would see the victim’s right to reply by no later than 9 days.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. It is objectively objective that the contents of text messages sent by the defendant to the victim are merely a simple expression of emotional humiliation or temporary labor, and there is no intention to do harm.