대여금
1. The part against Defendant B in the judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:
Defendant B shall be the Plaintiff 87,987.
1. Around March 29, 2015, Defendant B prepared and issued a confirmation that the Plaintiff would pay the same debt amount as the indicated in the following table “Items” and “the amount of confirmation” (hereinafter “instant confirmation”). The confirmation of this case indicate that the Plaintiff would pay all principal and interest accrued on the remaining items except the Nos. 1 and 5 as indicated below. The debt amount, the interest accrued after the preparation of the instant confirmation, for which the change was confirmed by the interest accrued, is indicated in the following “the amount of change” column:
(1) The amount of loan extended to 36,210,000 units of loan 36,210,000 units of loan 36,210,000 units of loan 3,00 units of loan 3,00,000 units of loan 3,00,00 3,50 units of loan 3,50,000 units of loan 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,50 units of loan 4 8,50,00 units of loan 40 units of loan 4,50 units of loan 18,000 units of loan 4,50 units of loan 1 to 2013,50 units of loan 1 to 36,00,00 units of loan 1 to 4,50,000 units of loan 1 to 36,50,000 units of loan 1 to 48,500 units of loan 86,486,86,00 units of loan 88.
2. The Plaintiff’s assertion as to the Plaintiff’s husband and wife operated an entertainment drinking house with the trade name of “H” (hereinafter “instant main shop”), and thereafter, the Plaintiff operated a mutual head office of “J” (hereinafter “instant head office”) by lending the Plaintiff’s business name from the Plaintiff.
With respect to the instant main points, the Plaintiff: (a) KRW 28 million on December 6, 201; (b) KRW 3 million on December 31, 2012; (c) KRW 3.5 million on January 4, 2013; and (d) January 201, 2013 to the Defendants.