However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 2, 2016, at around 03:50 on October 2, 2016, the Defendant talked to the effect that the above victim D will interfere with the other customers' surface of the water, and that the above victim would interfere with the other customers' surface.

Along with the 20 minutes of a soup, customers, who were locked in a soup room, were forced to do so by force and interfere with soup business of the victim, such as putting the victim a large sound, taking the victim’s face, and taking a bath to “Cr.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes in which a notice of a department related to reporting 12 cases is entered;

1. Relevant Article 314 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution [the scope of applicable sentences under law] [the scope of applicable sentences under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act] [the scope of applicable sentences under law] imprisonment with prison labor for not more than five years [the person who is subject to special sentencing] [the scope of applicable sentences] for mitigation of punishment: Non-applicable area for mitigation of punishment [the scope of recommended punishment]: Imprisonment with prison labor for not more than eight months [the decision of sentencing] for one year of suspended sentence to imprisonment with prison labor for not more than eight months (the decision of sentence