However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 3, 2018, the Defendant, at the “C” House located in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Da (Nam and fifty-five years of age), has brought a dispute with D (Nam and fifty-five years of age), and was disregarded by D in the process.

On December 4, 2018, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol at around 00:30 on December 4, 2018, when he was drunk, left the house of D located in E, and sought to extinguish the above residential area, which is the present residential building, by dusting via the outer wall, while the Defendant did not reach the commencement of fire-fighting by reporting the movement of G and D 112.

Accordingly, the defendant prepared fire prevention for the purpose of setting fire to buildings D and F used as residential areas and setting fire to buildings.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. -The legal chemical appraisal report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (to listen to shotly telephone statements);

1. Articles 175 and 164 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation, community service or order to attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. As to the reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act, the punishment shall be imposed in consideration of the following factors: (a) details of the crime; (b) risk of the method of the crime; (c) intent not to punish a person; (d) history of the crime; (e) circumstances after