(a)as shown in the reasons for the attachment of the claim;

(b) Judgment by service by Defendant A (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act)

C. Defendant E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N,O, P, Q, and R Confession (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act)

2. Determination as to the Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant B, C, and D

A. The facts of recognition [based on recognition] were written in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, 6, 7, 8, Eul evidence Nos. 2 and 3 (including the number of branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), and the purport of the entire pleadings as a whole. (1) The forest land T. 491 square meters in Daegu-gun, Daegu-gun, on February 5, 1986, was owned by U.S. and completed the registration of ownership transfer as to the shares of 3/8 and 2/8 shares by defendant DD on March 12, 1986.

(2) On February 29, 2016, the said forest was divided into the instant forest and V forest and 205 square meters in Daegu-gun, Daegu-gun.

The transfer registration of ownership has been completed to the Republic of Korea on the grounds of the co-acquisition of public land on the same day, and is currently being used as the Wed construction site in Daegu-gun.

(3) On April 2, 1986, the Farmland Improvement Cooperatives commenced Y construction in Daegu-gun X, and began with AB water guidance and completed the construction on March 1, 1997, to use AB water for agricultural purposes from Daegu-gun, Zuri to the above AAri.

(4) After January 1, 200, farmland improvement cooperatives were merged into the Korea Agricultural and Rural Infrastructure Corporation. On December 29, 2005, the name of the Korea Agricultural and Rural Infrastructure Corporation was changed to the Korea Agricultural and Rural Community Corporation. On December 29, 2008, the name was changed to the name of the plaintiff, and the status of the said Corporation was comprehensively transferred to the above corporation.

B. The Plaintiff’s assertion completed the construction of AB water liver, and until now, used the forest land of this case as the site for AB water liver, and Defendant B, C, and D did not demand compensation therefor or did not claim ownership. Therefore, at the time of commencement of occupation, the Plaintiff’s acquisition of the forest land for public use via the procedure.