When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On June 7, 2014, at around 21:13, the Defendant: (a) took a dispute over D, E, or E, in front of “C” located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul; (b) was satisfying E face with a large sound; (c) was satisfying off the victim F (36 years of age, women) who was living in the said area; and (d) said, the Defendant said that “Isat is satisfy and satisfy on the road.”

The Defendant, by misunderstanding the victim as above, committed assaulting the victim's face by drinking the victim's face one time by drinking the victim's face, shaking the head, and walking the her head one time due to a shaking, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police interrogation protocol of F and H:

1. Each police statement of E and D;

1. A report on investigation;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reports (CCTV video screen reading);

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.