If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

On March 15, 2013, the Defendant prepared a false statement of complaint against C using a computer for the purpose of having C receive criminal punishment in an irregular and irregular area.

The complaint is that "The defendant employed the defendant C as a designer and delivered a computer of an amount equivalent to 1.820,000 won at the market price, and even if he requested to return the computer after withdrawal on January 28, 2013, he embezzled it without returning it." On March 8, 2013, C returned the computer to D upon request of the defendant who requested the return of the computer on behalf of the computer, and D returned the computer to C on the same day, and even though D was contacted to the defendant and returned the computer from C, it did not find it.

Nevertheless, on March 19, 2013, the Defendant submitted the above written complaint by mail at the public service center of the Seoul Mine Police Station at the time undissatised Seoul, and rejected C.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of D and C;

1. Partial statement of the protocol concerning the examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Part concerning D's statement in the prosecutorial statement against the defendant

1. A complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to dialogues A and C related to cases (Evidence List 21);

1. Article 156 of the Criminal Act and Article 156 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;