G Imprisonment with prison labor for four months and for six months, each of the defendants A shall be punished by imprisonment.

However, this judgment is delivered to Defendant G.

1. On May 21, 2016, the Defendant of Defendant A’s perjury teachers (22 cm in total length, 11 cm in length) discarded the transition (22 cm in length) to C in dry field located in Yong-gun, Namnam-gun, Namnam-gun around May 21, 201.

In fact, investigation and trial have been conducted.

On May 22, 2016, the Defendant was not at the site of the instant case in the area near Yong-Gun D, Namnam-gun around the same day.

G asked G to “I am on May 21, 2016, I would like to see that I am going to the dry field located in Young-gun D before South Yong-gun, and that I would like to see that I was a witness to the investigation agency.” Accordingly, G would like to make a statement of witness at the former Young-gu Police Station and the Gwangju District Public Prosecutor’s Office.

Then, on January 17, 2017, the Defendant: (a) from the Young-gun Welfare Center for the Aged in the Young-gun, Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, Seoul to the Gwangju District Court located in 7-12 as law-abiding by Gwangju Dong-gu; (b) operated his Owing-gu and 3 trucks; and (c) was killed by G while driving them. “As if the investigation agency made a false statement so far, the Defendant is sealed even in the court.

“At the time G had a false legal testimony made it possible for G to make a false legal testimony.”

G was present at the court of Gwangju District Court No. 302 on January 17, 2017, 16:30 on the 302nd day of Gwangju District Court, Gwangju District Court No. 2016 Godan 4670 on the 201st day of May 21, 201, and later, I tried to see C as excessive in the above place around May 21, 201 and to see A.

B. After that, two police officers took the police vehicle and talked with A, C, and then returned to the next place.

B. He testified to the effect that, until the police cars return back to the next C, they were seen as they were in the same place, and that, as a witness of a cruel witness, he said that he would talk if necessary, and that he sent to A with the contact point written.

Accordingly, the Defendant instigated G to give a false statement contrary to his memory and to give a perjury.

2. Defendant G’s perjury