(a)the north-gu E, F, G lightweight steel structure at port;

A. The Plaintiff is the owner of the building in North-gu, North-gu, North-gu, J 895 square meters and its ground, and is the owner of the building in North-gu, North-gu, North-gu, North-si, North-si, North-si, North-do, 221 square meters, F-205 square meters, G 78 square meters and its ground

In addition, the Plaintiff is an owner of H 177 square meters and I large 223 square meters (the Plaintiff purchased the above land from the State on November 15, 2012 and completed the registration of transfer of ownership on November 16, 2012).

B. On August 2, 2004, Defendant D entered into a lease agreement with the Plaintiff on the lease of 24 square meters of the 1st floor store among the Y ground buildings in the north-gu, the north-gu, the north-gu, the port-si, and thereafter, Defendant D operated a restaurant (K and the building caused by death: L) from around that time, in the building caused by occurrence of a disaster.

C. On January 1, 2010, Defendant D entered into a lease agreement between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff, setting the rent of KRW 80 million for a building caused by a cause, KRW 7 million per month ( KRW 4 million per month, KRW 3 million per month, and KRW 3 million per month) and the period of December 31, 201 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) and continued to operate a restaurant in the building due to a cause.

In 209, Defendant D installed and used “B” facilities (hereinafter referred to as “facilities”) on the land 22.4 square meters (hereinafter referred to as “B”) indicated in the attached Table 2, among the land 895 square meters in land (1), Y-gu, Y-gu, Y-gu, Y-gu, Y-gu, Y-gu, Y-si, and in return, Defendant D paid KRW 1.5 million or KRW 1 million per month to the Plaintiff, separately from the rent of the building caused by death.

E. The instant lease agreement was terminated on December 31, 201, and the end of the period. Defendant D is running restaurant business by occupying and using the sponsed building, (B) building, and (1) building up to the present date.

F. On the other hand, on April 30, 2012, the Plaintiff: (a) leased a building caused by Ma with a deposit of KRW 30 million; (b) KRW 3.5 million per month; and (c) instead of receiving deposit of KRW 30 million from Ma, the Plaintiff, on May 7, 2012, ordered Ma to pay KRW 30 million out of its deposit of KRW 80 million.

recognized.