However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car BMW320.

On December 11, 2016, the Defendant driven the above car at around 14:00, and proceeded ahead of the name post office located at the right west of the light-time, by moving to the luminous citizen gymnasiums from the right edge of the river.

Since a crosswalk is installed, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving safely after checking whether a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle is a person who well sees the front side and the right side of the motor vehicle, and then safely driving the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went to the right side of the road crossing from the direction of the course due to the negligence that led to the bypassing of it, and received the front side of the passenger car driving by the Defendant on the side of the victim C(W, 67 years old).

Defendant 1 suffered injury to the victim, such as the 10 week off the 10-day scke scke and the scke scke in the vicinity of the scke, which are in need of approximately 10 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to traffic accident reports, accident scene photographs, vehicle photographs, and diagnostic certificates;

1. Relevant Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act - The extent of damage suffered by the victim;

As above, the Defendant is fully aware of the facts constituting an offense. - The Defendant is the first offender who has no past history of punishment. - The Defendant appears to subscribe to a comprehensive insurance and be able to partly compensate for the injury of the victim. In light of all the sentencing conditions revealed in the trial process in each of the above circumstances, sentencing is ordered as above.