A. The punishment sentenced by the court below to the defendant (ten months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below against the defendant is too unfortunate and unfair.

2. The fact that the defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case, and that he made efforts to recover from damage is a favorable circumstance.

On the other hand, the defendant has a record of criminal punishment several times for the same crime, and even during the period of repeated crime for the same crime, the fact that the crime of this case was committed, and the fact that the crime was serious in light of the contents of the crime is disadvantageous.

In full view of the aforementioned circumstances and the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and other circumstances that form the conditions for the sentencing as indicated in the instant case, it cannot be deemed that the lower court’s sentence is too heavy or unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant and prosecutor's argument of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.