1) The Plaintiff is a national rental housing unit located in Ansan-si, Ansan-si, 783-2, an apartment complex of 2 complexes (517 households) and 5 complexes (1,039 households) (hereinafter “instant apartment complex”).

(2) Defendant Cul harassment is a company that executed the new construction of the apartment of this case by being awarded a contract with the Plaintiff on behalf of the said joint supply and demand organization by constituting a joint supply and demand organization with the Yangyang Environmental Industry Co., Ltd.

3) The Defendant Cooperative guaranteed the Plaintiff the obligation to repair the defects of the Defendant Cul harassment regarding the instant apartment. On July 15, 2005, the Defendant Cooperative concluded each of the following warranty contracts with respect to the instant apartment between the Defendant Culululul on the part of July 15, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as the “each of the instant warranty contracts,” including each of the above warranty contracts.

The Plaintiff entered into a guarantee agreement, and was issued by the Defendant Union. The warranty period of 138143, Jul. 17, 2008 - 17 to Jul. 16, 2009 - 320,730,541 1 to Jul. 17, 2008 238142 to Jul. 16, 2010 - 320,730,541 - 38141 to Jul. 17, 2008 - 481 to Jul. 16, 201 - Defendant 205 to 17 to 481,095, 812 to 438140,8140,745,75,785,75,781,785,785,785,75,781,785,75,71,208.

2) Accordingly, Defendant Culul partially repaired the defect. However, the apartment of this case still remains as the defect in the attached Table 1, including the sum table of the defect repair expenses for common areas and the table of the sum table of defect repair expenses for the attached section for exclusive use. [Grounds for recognition] There is no dispute, each entry in the attached Table 1 through 11, and the appraiser A (hereinafter “Appraiser”).

result of the appraisal, the existence of defects in the purport of the whole pleading.