Defendant

A is the father of Defendant B, and Defendant B is the father of the network C.

On September 25, 2014, Defendants conspired to acquire C’s real estate by forging a will letter under C’s name.

1. The Defendants, at the time of the death of the said C, indicated the title “C” in the form of Ma4, “B” in the form of a will, “BC grants all the property within the house (D) and all the property within the family, such as his/her last father,” “Annual Gu D”, “date of preparation”, and “C” in the name of the said C, and affixed C’s seal on the name of the said C.

In addition, on October 24, 2014, the Defendants submitted to the public official in charge of the above public service of the above public service center of the 31 Busan Family Court, the 31st Busan Family Court, an application form for the approval of will, attached to the application form for the approval of will, as if they were duly formed.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to commit a will in the name of C, which is a private document on rights and obligations, with the aim of uttering.

2. On June 26, 2015, the Defendants: (a) had a certified judicial scrivener E at the Busan District Court registry at the Busan District Court on the 31 Busan District Court on June 26, 2015; (b) had a certified judicial scrivener E enter the said registration and the public official in charge into the foregoing registry at the Busan District Court registry at the Busan District Court; (c) had a certified judicial scrivener E enter the said registration and the foregoing details into a computerized account with C’s will; (d) No. 153.7m2 of the Busan District Do-gu, Busan District; and (d) had a certified public official in charge file an application for the transfer of ownership in Defendant A’s name on September 25, 2014 with respect to 20m20 of the house subject to appraisal on the ground of a testamentary gift on September 25, 2014; and (d) had the said public official in charge enter the said application into the computerized account with the ownership equal to the said application and stored

As a result, the Defendants conspired to make electronic records identical to the original of the notarial deed.