When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is running a store C.

On March 14, 2013, the Defendant: “E had been living with F at the present time in the D market; and thereafter, the D market began to be frightened; E had a desire to take the floor of D market when he was withdrawn from drinking and had assault and violence; E had a lot of accusation cases. On March 14, 2013, at the front of the D market in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Seoul-gu, the Defendant found neighboring merchants, demanded the court to have issued a false testimony different from fact, refused it, and had a signature on the D market, a member of the D market, which is a member of the D market.”

As above, the Defendant damaged the honor of the victims by openly pointing out facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The police statement of E and F;

1. A complaint;

1. Application of the statutes governing a copy of the written application;

1. Article 307 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Circumstances acknowledged by the record on the assertion that the facts alleged in Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are for the public interest and for the sake of public interest, i.e., the Defendant: (a) prepared the instant coal application with the intent to submit it as favorable material in both assault cases with the complainants; and (b) obtained the merchant’s signature; (c) includes the contents indicating the de facto marital relationship of the complainants; and (c) all merchants who signed the coal application already known the contents of the written coal application.

(2) by its own declaration of intent.