However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On June 25, 2019, at around 02:56, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft as to “D” in the operation of the victim C (the 40-year-old) located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu; (b) caused a gap in the victim’s surveillance neglected; and (c) caused an intrusion upon the victim’s inside and outside of the said store, thereby resulting in a theft of one salary grade equivalent to KRW 3,500, the market price of the victim’s ownership.

2. On July 14, 2019, at around 01:36, the Defendant cut off the victim’s “G” in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, the victim’s “F management.” Around 01:36, there was a gap in which the victim’s surveillance was neglected, and then intrudes the victim’s inside and outside of the said store into three strings and three strings in an amount equivalent to KRW 23,200, the market price of the victim’s ownership, which is the victim’s 23,200, the number of years, 10, and one strings, if any,

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. CCTV photographs for committing a crime;

1. C and F statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records;

1. Article 330 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Taking into account the fact that the crime of larceny has been committed repeatedly due to the reason repeatedly in sentencing under Article 48(1) of the Confiscation Criminal Act, the fact that the person committed the crime of larceny, who attempted to commit the crime of larceny in his life, stolen the food from his living room, the amount of damage is not large, and the fact