교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.
except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a person who is engaged in the driving of the modern vehicle B.
On July 22, 2018, at around 11:25, the Defendant met the part of the left-hand bridge of the victim C (the 77-year-old woman, hereinafter referred to as “C”) walking along the bend-hand side of the said vehicle on the front side of the said vehicle on the front side of the said vehicle, where one lane of the two roads in front of the “Magsan Integrated Bus Terminal” (2235 as the center of the Sigsan-gu, the front side of the said road was going to the Cheongju-dong, and the front side of the said road was turned to the front side of the said vehicle.
Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim by negligence in the course of business as above, thereby getting the victim to suffer injury, such as the right-hand knee abandonment of the light knee and the right-hand fele (around 10 weeks need for medical treatment)
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. CA statement on the occurrence of a traffic accident;
1. As a result of the inquiry of the fact to the Director of the D Hospital in this Court, the actual fact survey report, each photograph/cinematographic output (including black image), diagnosis report, investigation report (No. 10) law shall apply.
1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1), Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Criminal Facts, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act
1. Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution provides that the degree of injury to the reason for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is significant, at the time of the time, many people was cutting the crosswalk, and before the Defendant’s vehicle was approaching the crosswalk, many people near the bus terminal are crossing the crosswalk due to the vehicle stop signal, and even though the Defendant was waiting for a large number of vehicles, the Defendant committed the instant crime, and thus, the degree of negligence was very large, and there was a significant risk to the lives and bodies of an unspecified number of unspecified people, and there was no traffic offense or accident history, and the Defendant was damaged.