However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On November 16, 2015, at the “D” restaurant operated by the victim C in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, on November 16, 2015, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by having the customers in the above restaurant leave his/her place of business and interfere with the victim’s restaurant business by force by having the customers in the above restaurant leave his/her place of business by 20 minutes.

2. Around 21:15 on the same day, the Defendant damaged the said vehicle by destroying the back glass of the Victim G-owned HM vehicle parked on the road in front of the “F church” located outside of the said restaurant, and in front of the “F church” located in Seogugu, Daegu, Seo-gu, to the extent that the repair cost is equivalent to 2.50,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of the G’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 314 of the Criminal Act, Articles 314(1) and 366 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (Consideration to the agreement with victims);

1. An order to provide community service and attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;