beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.10.25 2017고단4900

공문서위조등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Seized evidence 1 to 4 shall be confiscated.

Of the facts charged in the instant case.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a foreigner of Chinese nationality.

The Defendant assumes a large number of unspecified persons, who are in the name of the person, used for a crime, and charged all the money in the account with the said account after the completion of the investigation, and then take it back. The organization of the “Sishing” organization is composed of the following: (a) the Defendant: (b) the Defendant: (c) the Defendant: (d) the Defendant: (e) the Defendant: (e) the Defendant: (e) the Defendant: (e) the Defendant was induced from telephone; (e) the Defendant received money from the people; (b) the collection of money from the people; (e) the receipt of money from the persons; (f) the delivery of money from the persons; and (f) the delivery of money to the remittance book; and (c) the Defendant made a mutual resolution with C, D, name, and non-name: (c) the Defendant was responsible for collecting money from the people in accordance with the direction of name, name, and non-name, and received eight percent of the collected money from the people.

On July 6, 2017, 201:12:17 on July 6, 2017, the name, portrait, etc., of the organization for licensing, misrepresenting the Central Twit Team F inspection in Seoul, and making a phone call to the victim G, and “ There is a passbook with the victim’s name.”

It confirms the Internet website (IP address H).

It must be confirmed whether the person is the victim or the victim.

It is possible to get off money in the passbook so that money can be found in the passbook.

“After finding money, the Defendant, at around July 6, 2017, tried to obtain cash and US dollars from the victim who was in possession of the said name in front of the Lcare Center located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, and obtained 30 million won and US dollars from the victim to obtain 50,000 won from the victim, while the Defendant was able to obtain 30 million US dollars from the victim and 50,000 US dollars by the victim’s report.