2. We examine the judgment on the grounds of appeal, and consider the following: (a) if the defendant was found to have committed an attempted crime for the first time in the judgment of the court, his mistake is recognized, and the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant; and (b) the victim does not want to do so.

However, as the court below properly pointed out, ① the defendant was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment with prison labor for night residence intrusion theft, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court on October 1, 201, which became final and conclusive on February 11, 201, and the execution of the above punishment was completed on May 30, 201, each of the crimes of this case was committed again during the repeated crime period; ② the victim’s image photographed against the victim’s will to cause a sense of sexual humiliation, ③ the fact that the nature of the crime is extremely poor, ③ the defendant’s each crime appears to have suffered a considerable mental suffering; ④ the court below was sentenced to punishment by considering the circumstances favorable to the defendant; and the defendant recognized that the crime of attempted crime was committed in the court of first instance and divided his mistake.

In full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the commission of the crime; and (b) the circumstances alleged in the present argument and the record are considered as grounds for appeal; (c) even if the Defendant’s grounds for appeal are considered as grounds for appeal, it cannot be deemed that the lower court is too unreasonable to the extent that the Defendant’s sentence should be reversed.