폭행
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Expenses of the trial shall be borne by the defendant.
The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) is as follows: (a) the Defendant used the way to see the victim E (12) only once, and did not see the victim E (12)’s right head in drinking, and there was no fact that the victim attached the Defendant spreads the victim’s right head; and (b) there was no fact that the victim’s head was fright toward the victim’s right side (the first trial date). In full view of the judgment of the court below and the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the trial court, the Defendant assaulted the victim by taking into account the victim’s right head at one time, as described in the facts charged, once the victim’s upper part of the Defendant’s upper part of the Defendant’s upper part of the Defendant’s upper part.
The defendant's assertion is sufficiently acceptable, and the defendant's assertion is without merit (the defendant, unlike the defendant's argument, has a head of the victim by hand, not his/her own opinion but his/her own opinion.
The Defendant made a statement (Evidence Nos. 23, 25). The Defendant stated at an investigative agency that the injured person was not able to wear clothes of the Defendant (Evidence No. 24, 25 pages), and that the Defendant was fluording the victim who was able to wear the Defendant in the trial of the Party.
argument is asserted.
As a result, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the costs of the lawsuit are assessed as per Disposition by applying Articles 191(1) and 190(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.