2. The judgment of the Defendant is the primary offender, and the confession, and reflects the instant crime, etc. are favorable to the Defendant.

However, in full view of the nature and social impact of the instant crime, the amount of the penalty determined by the summary order and the lower judgment, and other various circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive for the instant crime, and circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., even if considering the favorable circumstances for the Defendant, it cannot be deemed that the fine imposed by the lower court is unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is without merit and thus dismissed pursuant to Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.