소유권이전등기
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
1. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the judgment of the court of first instance are the additional documents submitted in the trial and rejected all the entries and images of Gap evidence Nos. 13 through 19 (including paper numbers) which are insufficient to recognize the plaintiff's assertion. Each "six parcels" in the second sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed "six parcels according to the plan to create the whole housing complex", " June 12, 2012" in the second part of the 18th part shall be deemed " June 12, 2013", "No. 6, 2013" in the third part of the 6th part shall be deemed "No. 201, Nov. 6, 2012", and part of the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since it is the grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance other than the following.
2. In the process of applying for the second authorization and permission, the Defendant issued a written consent to land use and a certificate of personal seal to the Plaintiff on March 29, 2013 of the judgment of the first instance court Nos. 20 to 3, 2013 as follows. Since the Plaintiff, G (a certified architect H) delegated the Plaintiff the authority to apply for a building permit to the Plaintiff, and submitted it to the Busan-Gun, upon which the Defendant voluntarily prepared a proxy form under the name of the Defendant and submitted it to the Plaintiff. The Defendant voluntarily prepared a proxy form under the name of the Defendant and voluntarily submitted it to the Busan-Gun, and then withdrawn the Plaintiff’s application for authorization and permission on June 19, 2013.
(hereinafter “Related Cases”. From No. 7 to No. 7 of the first instance court’s judgment, the Plaintiff demanded the Defendant to provide a written consent to land use and a certificate of personal seal impression, which is part of the documents necessary for the Plaintiff’s application for the second authorization and permission, and the Defendant issued a written consent to land use and a certificate of personal seal impression to the Plaintiff on March 29, 2013, as seen earlier. According to the purport of the entries and arguments in No. 13 of the evidence No. 13, the appellate court shall obtain delegation from the Defendant in the related case.