beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2016.01.22 2015고단2064

대응되는 죄명 없음(2010.02.27 전환)

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. Around July 4, 1998, the summary of the facts charged in the instant case violated the restrictions on the operation of vehicles by the road management agency by loading and operating freight exceeding the limit weight of the freight vehicles owned by the Defendant, on the road at every 34.7 km point of the front of the transmission station at the 34.7km of the coastwise Highway.

2. The prosecutor of the judgment shall also impose a fine under Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005) with respect to the facts charged of this case where the agent, employee, or other worker of a corporation commits a violation under Article 83 (1) 2 in relation to the business of the corporation.

A public prosecution was instituted by applying the part "," and the defendant received a summary order subject to review and the above summary order against the defendant became final and conclusive.

In this regard, the Constitutional Court rendered a decision of unconstitutionality on October 28, 2010 with respect to the above provision of the law (Supreme Court Decision 2010Hun-Ga14, 15, 21, 27, 35, 38, 44, 70 (Joint) Decided October 28, 2010) and thus, the above provision of the law was retroactively invalidated in accordance with the proviso of Article 47(2) of the Constitutional Court Act.

Thus, the facts charged of this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.