However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On April 8, 2017, the Defendant: (a) driven a B-hurbed vehicle with alcohol concentration of 0.083% from the GS parking lot located in the Taedong-gu Daejeon-dong from about 300 meters to the fair negative distance in Daegu-gu. (b) around 04:20 on April 8, 2017.

2. On April 8, 2017, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) driven the pertinent car while under the influence of alcohol content 0.083% in blood around 04:30 on April 8, 2017, while driving the said car at a speed of about 50km per hour from the border bonds of Daegu Jung-gu, the compensation for the 634-gu, a fair four-distance forward street, which is in front of the 634, to the view of the audience at a speed of about

Since there is an intersection where a signal, etc. is installed, it is necessary to check whether a person engaged in driving service has a vehicle passing through the intersection by reducing the speed and by properly examining the right and the right of the road, and to safely drive the vehicle in accordance with the traffic signals and prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant, while neglecting this, was driven by the victim C(54) who entered the intersection from the center of the right-side distance to the right-side four-distance distance from the center of the right-hand edge direction by the negligence of entering the red line. The front part of the DNA taxi vehicle was driven by the victim C(54) of the victim C(54).

As a result, the Defendant suffered, by the above occupational negligence, the injury to the victim C, such as an open wound of the body part of the body part of the deceased who is in need of approximately three weeks of treatment, and the injury to the victim E (29 years of age) who was accompanied by the said taxi vehicle for about four weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect C by the police;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Fact-finding reports on drivers of drinking alcohol and inquiry into the results of crackdown on drinking alcohol;

1. The result of the signal system:

1. An analysis of each traffic accident;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Each written diagnosis;