2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Accordingly, the reasoning for the judgment of the court regarding the instant case is as follows, given that the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the following “the part completed on February, 200.”

2. The 5th to 15th of the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be the same as follows.

According to the instant lease contract, a joint guarantor shall guarantee the full performance of the obligations of the above A, a lessee under the instant lease contract, such as the payment of rent and the return of leased goods, and if a joint guarantor concludes a partial modification contract, he/she shall be deemed to have consented to such modification even if the joint guarantor does not separately affix his/her signature on the modified contract (Article 6 of the above contract). In addition, the instant lease contract provides for “the term of lease: from the date of the contract to the date of termination, the date of delivery: the date of the contract is requested by A; the place of delivery: the place of delivery; etc. designated by A” (Article 2 of the above contract); with respect to the validity of the contract, “verification of the items, quantity, and the place of delivery, etc. of leased goods not specified in the basic contract, shall be deemed to be valid during the transaction, and this contract shall be deemed to have been concluded in accordance with the unit price, such as the name, size, quantity increase, and addition of site after the date of the initial contract.”