2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, fifty thousand won.

피고인은 2013. 9. 27. 05:00경 B 포터 화물차를 운전하여 논산시 부창동에 있는 부창초등학교 옆 도로를 부창초등학교 쪽에서 쎈뽈여자고등학교 쪽으로 진행하던 중 전방 및 좌우를 잘 살피지 않고 그대로 진행한 업무상 과실로, 진행방향 좌측에 있던 피해자 주식회사 케이티 소유의 전신주 기둥을 피고인의 화물차 좌측 앞부분으로 들이받아 위 전신주 하단을 깨뜨려 위 전신주를 쓰러지게 하였다.

As a result, the Defendant, while destroying and damaging the utility poles owned by the victim to bring about KRW 1,135,00, has immediately stopped and escaped without taking necessary measures.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement C’s police statement;

1. Each entry in the actual condition survey report, on-site photographs, and estimates, or the application of video-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act Article 334(1) of the Provisional Payment Order is based on a comprehensive consideration of the following: (a) the fact that the defendant is the first offender and is reflecting the depth of the crime; (b) the damage was recovered due to the defendant's comprehensive motor vehicle insurance coverage; and (c) the circumstances shown in the pleadings of this case, such as