beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2018.10.05 2018고단1435

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2018 Highest 1435"

1. On December 20, 2017, at a place where it is impossible to identify a place, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim C, who became aware of the fact through “B”, a cosmetic wholesale website around that time, using telephone and text messages, that “it may sell at a price of 40% the 17.5 million won cosmetic and health auxiliary food.”

However, in fact, the Defendant had intended to use part of the amount of money received from the victim at the time for living expenses, personal debt repayment, etc., so even if receiving the purchase price of cosmetics from the victim, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to supply the equivalent goods properly.

Although the Defendant received a total of KRW 7,140,00 from the damaged party to December 26 of the same year, the Defendant did not deliver cosmetics, etc. equivalent to the total amount of KRW 5,880,00 to the injured party from January 11, 2018.

In this respect, the Defendant acquired pecuniary benefits by deceiving the victim.

2. The Defendant, who signed the above investigation and signed the above investigation, was accused of having obtained a request from the police officer belonging to the Gyeonggi-gu Police Station for appearance from the Gyeonggi-gu Police Station for appearance, and had received a request for appearance from the police officer who was using financial transaction, etc., and had his/her own name during the investigation of the above case, with a bad credit relationship.

On January 11, 2018, the Defendant: (a) at the Gyeonggi-Pacific Police Station’s office and the Economic 2 Team office located in 140, following the closure of the strike; (b) around that time, upon receiving a suspect examination from the police officer F, etc., who is the police officer of the above police station, for the case of fraud of goods that C raised against the Defendant, and (c) made a statement of his/her name and resident registration number; and (d) made a suspect examination as if he/she was D; and (c) perused the relevant suspect examination protocol.