2. There are extenuating circumstances to consider in favor of all the Defendants, such as the confession and reflection of all the Defendants, and the agreement with the victims.

However, the crime of this case appears to have been committed by the Defendants on the grounds that the Defendants committed violence against the NANs or committed acts of taking money or other valuables into custody, and the Defendants appear to have been committed with bad faith in the NANs. The Defendants were sentenced to imprisonment (in the case of Defendant A), or imprisonment with prison labor (in the case of Defendant C), or imprisonment with prison labor (in the case of Defendant C), or imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of taking violence against the NANs or of taking money or other valuables under the suspension of execution (in the case of Defendant C), and again committed the crime of this case during the period of repeated offense or suspended execution. Considering the Defendants’ age, character and conduct, environment, criminal records, motive, means and consequence of the crime, degree of damage, circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the lower court cannot be deemed to be

3. In conclusion, the defendants' appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since all of the appeals are without merit.