Judgment

The crime of Bophishing in this case requires strict punishment against social harm, and is a good crime due to planned and organized crimes.

The role of the counselor in charge of the defendants is an essential role in the crimes of Bosing.

However, the Defendants showed the attitude of recognizing and opposing the instant crime. The participation period is considerably shorter than six days for Defendants A, B, and D, and 45 days for Defendants C.

The victim and the defendant A, B, and D do not want the punishment of the defendants in the original trial, while the defendant C does not want the punishment of the defendants in the original trial.

Defendant

A has no record of criminal punishment, and Defendant B and D are the primary offenders, and Defendant C is punished by a fine.

In addition, considering all of the sentencing conditions, such as the age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances of crime, and family relationship of the Defendants, the sentence imposed by the lower court cannot be deemed as being too uneasible.

In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal against the defendants is groundless, and all appeals are dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.