If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The facts charged are also stated in the facts that the defendant took a bath, but the prosecutor did not prosecute the facts as a crime of insult, and the defendant's intimidationd a public official in the performance of his duties is not deemed to have been prosecuted. As such, among the facts charged, the part corresponding to the obstruction of performance of duties (the part of violence against a public official performing his duties) among the facts charged is organized as follows and recognized the facts charged

On December 28, 2014, around 01:58, the Defendant committed assault against C and D on the ground that C and D moved their sloping C and D to India on the ground that they moved to India by shouldering themselves during the 112 report during the 2010s, which the Defendant got on the road in front of the National Bank, which is located in the direction of the Gu citizen, on the front of the 196-way.

As a result, the Defendant assaulted police officers who perform legitimate duties on the handling of 112 Reporting Cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to D and C

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so ordered as per Disposition in consideration of the following circumstances: although the degree of assault on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is not easy, it is against the law, and there is no record of the same kind of crime, and there is no record of other crime in addition to the punishment of a fine once for the crime of injury.