beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 상주지원 2015.03.17 2015고단35

교통사고처리특례법위반등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 12, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of one million won for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) in the residents support of the Daegu District Court on August 12, 2014, but the Prosecutor appealed and continues to trial at the Daegu District Court (2014No2930).

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Road Traffic Act, the Defendant is a person engaging in driving a BScar car.

On January 1, 2015, at around 02:40, the Defendant driven the said car, and had the motorway 500-mpon road located in the official road of the official road at the time of residence along the two-lanes from the jurisdiction of Kimcheon-si to the jurisdiction of the Si.

At the time, since it was night and a ice length, the driver had the duty of care to reduce the speed in advance and thoroughly see the right and the left and the right of the driver, and prevent the accident. However, the defendant was negligent in neglecting the duty of a ice-free shop, and the defendant tried to find and stop the ice-free car of the victim C(35 years old) driving in the direction of the ice-free shop at the same time due to the negligence of neglecting the duty of a ice-free shop, and tried to find and stop the ice-free vehicle late later, but the part of the damaged vehicle was left behind by the left-hand part of the driver's vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt and tensions that require approximately three weeks of medical treatment due to occupational negligence, and at the same time damaged the damaged vehicle to cover approximately KRW 9,606,573 of repair costs.

2. A person violating the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall not operate a motor vehicle on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance. However, the Defendant operated a BScar without mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police officer with regard to C (Investigation Record No. 39 pages);

1. The application of the law of the actual survey report.