A. In the first instance trial, the part of the judgment of the first instance against the Defendants and Co-Defendant D (hereinafter “D”), stating that “Plaintiff B (hereinafter “Plaintiff B”) and C sent to the prosecution with each indictment opinion,” among the article in [Attachment 1] (hereinafter “the article in this case”) (hereinafter “the article in this case”), and “Plaintiff A (hereinafter “Plaintiff bank”) and its related persons demand the other party to pay for the obligation related to the instant adjoining real estate” (hereinafter “instant alleged second fact”), and ③ the part of the judgment of the first instance stating that “the Plaintiff bank took advantage of the benefit of repayment as above, and entered into a land sale contract with a third party,” and “the Plaintiff bank additionally deleted the Plaintiff’s right to request compensation for damages arising out of the search and seizure of the pertinent land in civil prosecution as part of the complaint in this case (hereinafter “the right to request compensation for damages arising out of the Internet portal’s name and indirect compulsory disposal”).

B. The court of first instance partly accepted the plaintiffs' request for deletion of articles and search results against D by citing the part of the plaintiffs' request for deletion, and also dismissed the plaintiffs' remaining claims by admitting part of the plaintiffs' claim for damages against D, and only the defendants appealed.

C. Therefore, only the part of the plaintiffs' claim for damages against the defendants cited by the court of first instance is subject to the judgment of this court.

2. This case by the court of first instance.