A. On February 2015, the Plaintiff was an accident that knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee kne

B. In the instant accident, the Plaintiff suffered from each injury or disease indicated in the table “An applicant injury or disease code” as indicated below, and applied for medical care benefits to the Defendant three times, but the Defendant did not accept all of them.

(B) On August 1, 2017, the Defendant’s medical care non-approval on August 1, 2017 and August 24, 2017 (hereinafter “instant disposition”). On December 3, 2015, the disposition date of the injury and disease name (S8342) disposal date, the content of the disposition date of the application date, and the non-approval on December 24, 2015, damage to the complex between the right slot and the outer side (S8342), on July 10, 2017, the non-approval on August 1, 2017, 201, the lower court did not dispute as to August 16, 2017 (S8352), the lower right-hand side (S8342), the lower right-hand side, the lower court’s evidence No. 2136, 2017, and the lower court did not dispute each of the following grounds:

2. Whether each of the dispositions of this case is legitimate

A. It is obvious that the Plaintiff’s assertion was caused by the instant accident, or the Plaintiff’s existing disease aggravated due to the damage to the right slives to the right slives, which is the injury claimed by the Plaintiff.

Therefore, each of the dispositions of this case rendered on different premise should be revoked as it is unlawful.

B. The evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to acknowledge that the above applicant’s disease was caused or the Plaintiff’s existing disease was aggravated due to the instant accident, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise.

Rather, there is no dispute between the parties or the Seoul Special Metropolitan City.