If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The defendant is a person who operates a sexual traffic business establishment with the trade name called C at the time of residence, and D shall be an employee.

Defendant 1 had a guest room in the above place, had a female sex trafficking E, and had his employee D receive KRW 110,00 from the customer who found in the above place of business and had the employee D engage in sexual intercourse with E. Accordingly, D around December 26, 2016, she received KRW 110,00 from the control police officer who found the customer in the above place of business and had the employee receive KRW 15,00,00 and allowed him to perform sexual intercourse with E.

As a result, the defendant conspired with D to engage in commercial sex acts such as brokerage.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the accused;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1. Application of each investigation report (Nos. 4 through 6 of the evidence list), each internal investigation report (No. 13, 14 of the evidence list);

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of Selective Commercial Sex Acts and Subordinate Statutes concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;