공무집행방해등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. On November 26, 2015, from around 20:10 to 22:00 the same day, the Defendant: (a) had been engaged in f and drinking in the E-dan of the Victim D’s Operation in Jeju; (b) had the microphone of other customers; (c) had the chair of other customers; (d) had the chair of other customers; (d) had the chair of the chair; and (e) had the chair of other customers; and (e) had the microsnating the micros of other customers; and (e) had the monitors installed at the bottom of the monitor and line straw.
Accordingly, the defendant conspired with the above F and interfered with the victim's main business by force.
2. The Defendant damaged property at the time and place specified in the preceding paragraph, together with F, was engaged in monitoring the market value of KRW 400,000,000, the victim D, as seen above, with the victim’s market value of KRW 250,000,000,000, the market price of KRW 100,000,000, microphones with the market price of KRW 100,000,
Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with the above F, damaged the victim's property.
3. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, and the Defendant’s injury at the places indicated in paragraph 1 around November 25, 2015, at around 22:05, and upon receipt of a report on the said failure, from the Victim H (50) who was an inspector belonging to the Dong-dong Police Station G District in the Dong-dong Police Station in the Dong-dong, Jeju who called out after being reported that the failure was broken, “hicked, etc.”;
Ison Doz. Doz.
“The question was asked.”
Defendant 1 stated above that the victim “I am this ar. I am the police. I am the police.
D. C. H. H. H. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L
As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning suppression, prevention and investigation of crimes, and at the same time injured the victim.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1.Each of H and D