When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant entered into the instant apartment complex No. 105 1602 with the representative D and entered the instant apartment complex, and entered into a daily work contract with the victim china Construction Co., Ltd. and the service company E to receive KRW 1,500,000 per month on the condition of active measures, such as not opening a door. From February 20, 2013 to March 22, 2013, the Defendant intruded into the residence managed by the victim by entering the said heading room, and interfered with the affairs of the sale and the sale management, such as the sales contract, the occupancy management, etc., for the unsold households of the victim china Construction Co., Ltd.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of the suspect interrogation protocol of the accused by the prosecution;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of the list of possession, fact-finding certificates, and the Acts and subordinate statutes of the eviction agreement;

1. Relevant Article 319 (1) and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of a fine for negligence, and the choice of a fine for negligence;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;