2. In light of the following: (a) the Defendant had been punished for the same kind of crime over several occasions; (b) the Defendant again committed the instant crime even during the period of repeated crime; (c) however, considering the fact that the degree of the instant injury is relatively minor; and (d) the fact that the Defendant agreed with the victim, as well as the fact that the Defendant agreed with the victim, etc. comprehensively examined various circumstances that are subject to sentencing conditions, such as the Defendant’s age and happiness environment, the lower court’s judgment’s decision is too unreasonable, and thus, the Prosecutor’s assertion is

3. Accordingly, the prosecutor’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition.